Reproduction of the Independent Auditor's Report

Based on the results of our audit, we have issued the following unqualified auditor’s report:

Independent Auditor’s Report

To MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien, Darmstadt

Report on the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report

Opinions

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien and its subsidiaries (the Group), which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021, the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in net equity and consolidated cash flow statement for the financial year from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. In addition, we have audited the combined management report of MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien inclusive of the remuneration report contained in a separate section in the combined management report, including the related disclosures for the financial year from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. In accordance with German legal requirements, we have not audited the components of the combined management report specified in the “Other Information” section of our auditor’s report.

In our opinion, on the basis of the knowledge obtained in the audit,

• the accompanying consolidated financial statements comply, in all material respects, with the IFRSs as adopted by the EU, and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to Section 315e (1) HGB [Handelsgesetzbuch: German Commercial Code] and, in compliance with these requirements, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, and financial position of the Group as of December 31, 2021, and of its financial performance for the financial year from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, and
• the accompanying combined management report as a whole provides an appropriate view of the Group’s position. In all material respects, this combined management report is consistent with the consolidated financial statements, complies with German legal requirements and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development. Our opinion on the combined management report does not cover the content of those components of the combined management report specified in the “Other Information” section of the auditor’s report.

Pursuant to Section 322 (3) sentence 1 HGB, we declare that our audit has not led to any reservations relating to the legal compliance of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report.

Basis for the Opinions

We conducted our audit of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report in accordance with Section 317 HGB and the EU Audit Regulation No 537/2014 (referred to subsequently as “EU Audit Regulation”) and in compliance with German Generally Accepted Standards for Financial Statement Audits promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer [Institute of Public Auditors in Germany] (IDW). Our responsibilities under those requirements and principles are further described in the “Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report” section of our auditor’s report. We are independent of the group entities in accordance with the requirements of European law and German commercial and professional law, and we have fulfilled our other German professional responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. In addition, in accordance with Article 10 (2)(f) of the EU Audit Regulation, we declare that we have not provided non-audit services prohibited under Article 5 (1) of the EU Audit Regulation. We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report.

Key Audit Matters in the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements for the financial year from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

Impairment testing of goodwill of the operating segment Electronics

Explanatory notes on the impairment tests can be found in the notes to the consolidated financial statements under Note 18.

The financial statement risk

The goodwill in the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2021 amounts to EUR 17,004 million (37.5% of the Group’s total assets), with EUR 4,420 million of this attributable to Electronics. Due to the acquisition of Versum Materials, Inc., USA, in October 2019 the goodwill of Electronics has increased significantly.

Goodwill on the level of the operating segments is to be tested for impairment once a year and may need be tested ad hoc if necessary. For the goodwill impairment test, the carrying amount is compared with the recoverable amount of the respective operating segment. The impairment test was carried out as at 31 August 2021. In performing the goodwill impairment test, the Group primarily determines the recoverable amount by means of the discounted cash flow method. The valuation model used to determine the recoverable amount is complex and the result of this valuation are highly dependent on the projection of future net cash flows (taking into account future revenue growth, profit margins and long-term growth rates) and the discount factor used, and therefore is subject to significant estimation uncertainty. Based on the impairment test conducted, the Group did not identify any need to recognize an impairment loss.

There is a risk for the financial statements that an existing goodwill impairment loss was not recognized. In addition, there is a risk that the related disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements are not complete and appropriate.

Our audit approach

Using our own sensitivity analyses, we assessed with the involvement of our own specialists in valuation the extent to which the goodwill of the cash-generating unit Electronics would still be sufficiently covered by the recoverable amount if assumptions and parameters underlying the calculations were to change in a manner that is deemed possible.

We reconciled the expected net cash flows underlying the recoverable amount calculation with the current medium-term plan approved by management. To assess the assumptions used in preparing the medium-term plan, we obtained an understanding of the planning process through discussions with company representatives, including corporate management and representatives from the corporate divisions, we assessed the plausibility and consistency of the explanations received with the projections, and we compared the assumptions used with the expectations of external analysts and sources.

As part of our audit of the discount factor, we analyzed the peer group used. With regard to other assumptions and parameters (e.g. risk-free interest rate, beta factor, market risk premium), we compared those assumptions and parameters with our own assumptions and publicly available data to assess whether these were appropriate and whether they were within the range of external recommendations, to the extent available. In addition, we verified the calculation model used to determine the discount factor and qualified the method by using our own calculation model. We also examined the accuracy of the Company’s previous forecasts by comparing the budgets of previous financial years with actual earnings and by analyzing deviations.

We assessed the appropriateness of the valuation model used. In order to assess the methodologically and mathematically appropriate implementation of the valuation method, we have traced the valuation carried out by the company on the basis of our own calculations and analyzed deviations. To verify arithmetical accuracy, we used a risk-based audit approach to recalculate the Company’s calculations based on samples contained in the valuation model.

In addition, we assessed whether the Company’s disclosures regarding the goodwill impairment test in the notes to the consolidated financial statements are complete and appropriate.

Our observations

The calculation method used for the goodwill impairment test is appropriate and in line with the applicable valuation principles. Overall, the assumptions and parameters used by management lead to an appropriate assessment of the recoverability of the goodwill. The disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements are complete and properly depict the judgment associated with the subsequent measurement of goodwill.

Completeness and measurement of income tax liabilities

Explanatory notes on the completeness and measurement of income tax liabilities can be found in the notes to the consolidated financial statements under Note 15.

The financial statement risk

As of December 31, 2021, income tax liabilities including liabilities for uncertain tax obligations amount to EUR 1,462 million.

The Group operates in different jurisdictions with different legal systems. The application of local regulations on income tax, tax incentives and transfer pricing rules is complex. The recognition and measurement of income tax liabilities require the Group to exercise judgment in assessing tax matters and to make estimates regarding uncertain tax positions.

The measurement of income tax liabilities is subject to judgment and estimation uncertainty. The Group engages event driven external experts to support its own risk assessment with expert opinions from tax specialists.

There is a risk for the financial statements that income tax liabilities are not fully recognized or not appropriately measured.

Our audit approach

We involved our own specialists in national and international tax law into the audit team in order to evaluate the Group’s assessment of tax risks and as far as obtained the related opinions of external experts engaged by the Group.

We obtained an understanding of existing tax risks through inquiry of employees of the tax department. We assessed the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the external experts and evaluated their expert opinions.

In addition, we analyzed correspondence with the relevant tax authorities and assessed the assumptions underlying the determination of income tax liabilities based on our knowledge and experience of how the relevant legal requirements are currently applied by the tax authorities and courts. We used a risk-based audit approach to audit the accuracy of the calculation of the income tax liabilities.

Our observations

The valuation model and assumptions underlying the completeness and measurement of income tax liabilities are reasonable.

Other Information

Management and the Supervisory Board are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the following components of the combined management report, whose content was not audited:

• the components of the combined non-financial statement included in a separate section in in the combined management report,
• the corporate governance statement referred to in the combined management report,
• information extraneous to combined management reports and marked as unaudited and
• the remaining parts of the annual report.

The other information does not comprise the consolidated financial statements, the audited parts of the combined management report and our auditor’s report.

Our opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report do not cover the other information, and consequently we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in so doing, to consider whether the other information

• is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements, with the information in the combined management report audited for content or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or
• otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

In accordance with our engagement, we performed a separate review of the combined non-financial statement. For the type, scope and results of this review, please refer to our audit report dated, February 17, 2021.

Responsibilities of Management and the Supervisory Board for the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Combined Management Report

Management is responsible for the preparation of consolidated financial statements that comply, in all material respects, with IFRSs as adopted by the EU, and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to Section 315e (1) HGB and that the consolidated financial statements, in compliance with these requirements, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position, and financial performance of the Group. In addition, management is responsible for such internal control as they have determined necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. They also have the responsibility for disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern. In addition, they are responsible for financial reporting based on the going concern basis of accounting unless there is an intention to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or there is no realistic alternative but to do so.

Furthermore, management is responsible for the preparation of the combined management report that, as a whole, provides an appropriate view of the Group’s position and is, in all material respects, consistent with the consolidated financial statements, complies with German legal requirements, and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development. In addition, management is responsible for such arrangements and measures (systems) as they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of a combined management report that is in accordance with the applicable German legal requirements, and to be able to provide sufficient appropriate evidence for the assertions in the combined management report.

The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the Group’s financial reporting process for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report.

Furthermore, the management and the Supervisory Board are responsible for the preparation of the remuneration report contained in a separate section of the combined management report, including the related disclosures, in accordance with the requirements of Section 162 AktG. They are also responsible for such internal control as they have determined necessary to enable the preparation of the remuneration report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and whether the combined management report as a whole provides an appropriate view of the Group’s position and, in all material respects, is consistent with the consolidated financial statements and the knowledge obtained in the audit, complies with the German legal requirements and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development, as well as to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Section 317 HGB and the EU Audit Regulation and in compliance with German Generally Accepted Standards for Financial Statement Audits promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW) will always detect a material misstatement. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements and this combined management report.

We exercise professional judgement and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements and of the combined management report, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinions. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal controls.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit of the consolidated financial statements and of arrangements and measures (systems) relevant to the audit of the combined management report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of these systems.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used by management and the reasonableness of estimates made by management and related disclosures.
• Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in the auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and in the combined management report or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our respective opinions. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease to be able to continue as a going concern.
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements present the underlying transactions and events in a manner that the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and financial performance of the Group in compliance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to Section 315e (1) HGB.
• Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Group to express opinions on the consolidated financial statements and on the combined management report. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our opinions.
• Evaluate the consistency of the combined management report with the consolidated financial statements, its conformity with [German] law, and the view of the Group’s position it provides.
• Perform audit procedures on the prospective information presented by management in the combined management report. On the basis of sufficient appropriate audit evidence we evaluate, in particular, the significant assumptions used by management as a basis for the prospective information, and evaluate the proper derivation of the prospective information from these assumptions. We do not express a separate opinion on the prospective information and on the assumptions used as a basis. There is a substantial unavoidable risk that future events will differ materially from the prospective information.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with the relevant independence requirements, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, the related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter.

Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

Report on the Assurance on the Electronic Rendering of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Combined Management Report Prepared for Publication Purposes in Accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB

We have performed assurance work in accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the rendering of the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report (hereinafter the “ESEF documents”) contained in the electronic file “merckkgaa-2021 – 12 – 31-de.zip” (SHA256-Hashwert: d438c78fd1d4165965b91d5c4aa776e5dbefe8f00e18575da76e5a3ca3fd7bce) made available and prepared for publication purposes complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB for the electronic reporting format (“ESEF format”). In accordance with German legal requirements, this assurance work extends only to the conversion of the information contained in the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report into the ESEF format and therefore relates neither to the information contained in these renderings nor to any other information contained in the file identified above.

In our opinion, the rendering of the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report contained in the electronic file made available, identified above and prepared for publication purposes complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB for the electronic reporting format. Beyond this assurance opinion and our audit opinion on the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the accompanying combined management report for the financial year from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021 contained in the “Report on the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Combined Management Report” above, we do not express any assurance opinion on the information contained within these renderings or on the other information contained in the file identified above.

We conducted our assurance work on the rendering of the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report contained in the file made available and identified above in accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB and the IDW Assurance Standard: Assurance Work on the Electronic Rendering of Financial Statements and Management Reports Prepared for Publication Purposes in Accordance with Section 317 (3a) HGB (IDW AsS 410 (10.2021)) and the International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised). Our responsibility in accordance therewith is further described below. Our audit firm applies the IDW Standard on Quality Management 1: Requirements for Quality Management in Audit Firms (IDW QS 1).

The Company’s management is responsible for the preparation of the ESEF documents including the electronic rendering of the consolidated financial statements and the combined management report in accordance with Section 328 (1) sentence 4 item 1 HGB and for the tagging of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with Section 328 (1) sentence 4 item 2 HGB.

In addition, the company’s management is responsible for such internal control that they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of ESEF documents that are free from material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB for the electronic reporting format.

The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the process of preparing the ESEF documents as part of the financial reporting process.

Our objective is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ESEF documents are free from material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB. We exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the assurance work. We also:

• Identify and assess the risks of material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements of Section 328 (1) HGB, design and perform assurance procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain assurance evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our assurance opinion.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the assurance on the ESEF documents in order to design assurance procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an assurance opinion on the effectiveness of these controls.
• Evaluate the technical validity of the ESEF documents, i.e. whether the file made available containing the ESEF documents meets the requirements of the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815, as amended as at the reporting date, on the technical specification for this electronic file.
• Evaluate whether the ESEF documents provide an XHTML rendering with content equivalent to the audited consolidated financial statements and the audited combined management report.
• Evaluate whether the tagging of the ESEF documents with Inline XBRL technology (iXBRL) in accordance with the requirements of Articles 4 and 6 of the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815, as amended as at the reporting date, enables an appropriate and complete machine-readable XBRL copy of the XHTML rendering.

Further Information pursuant to Article 10 of the EU Audit Regulation

We were elected as group auditor at the annual general meeting on April 23, 2021. We were engaged by the Supervisory Board on July 5, 2021. We have been the group auditor of MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien without interruption since the financial year 1995.

We declare that the opinions expressed in this auditor’s report are consistent with the additional report to the Supervisory Board pursuant to Article 11 of the EU Audit Regulation (long-form audit report).

Other matter – Use of the Auditor’s Report

Our auditor´s report must always be read together with the audited consolidated financial statements and the audited combined management report as well as the examined ESEF documents. The consolidated financial statements and combined management report converted to the ESEF format – including the versions to be published in the German Federal Gazette [Bundesanzeiger] – are merely electronic renderings of the audited consolidated financial statements and the audited group management report and do not take their place. In particular, the ESEF report and our assurance opinion contained therein are to be used solely together with the examined ESEF documents made available in electronic form.

German Public Auditor Responsible for the Engagement

The German Public Auditor responsible for the engagement is Dirk Janz.

Frankfurt am Main, February 17, 2022

KPMG AG

Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

[Original German version signed by:]

[signature] Janz
Wirtschaftsprüfer
[German Public Auditor]

[signature] Jung
Wirtschaftsprüfer
[German Public Auditor]

Limited Assurance Report of the Independent Auditor regarding the combined non-financial statement¹

To the Supervisory Board of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

We have performed an independent limited assurance engagement on the combined non-financial statement (further “combined non-financial statement”) of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (further also “Company” or “the Group”) for the period from January 1 to December 31, 2021.

As described in the combined non-financial statement, the Group engaged external providers to perform assessments and audits. The evaluation of the adequacy and accuracy of the conclusions from these external assessments was not part of our limited assurance engagement.

Management’s Responsibility

The legal representatives of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, are responsible for the preparation of the combined non-financial statement in accordance with §§ 315b, 315c in conjunction with 289b to 289e HGB and with Article 8 of REGULATION (EU) 2020/852 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (further “EU Taxonomy Regulation”) and the supplementing Delegated Acts as well as the interpretation of the wordings and terms contained in the EU Taxonomy Regulation and in the supplementing Delegated Acts by the Company as disclosed in Section “Reporting in accordance with the EU Taxonomy Regulation” of the combined non-financial statement.

This responsibility of the legal representatives includes the selection and application of appropriate methods to prepare the combined non-financial statement and the use of assumptions and estimates for individual disclosures which are reasonable under the given circumstances. Furthermore, the legal representatives are responsible for the internal controls they deem necessary for the preparation of the combined non-financial statement that is free of – intended or unintended – material misstatements.

The EU Taxonomy Regulation and the supplementing Delegated Acts contain wordings and terms that are still subject to substantial uncertainties regarding their interpretation and for which not all clarifications have been published yet. Therefore, the legal representatives have included a description of their interpretation in Section “Reporting in accordance with the EU Taxonomy Regulation” of the combined non-financial statement. They are responsible for its tenability. Due to the innate risk of diverging interpretations of vague legal concepts, the legal conformity of these interpretations is subject to uncertainty.

Practitioner’s Responsibility

It is our responsibility to express a conclusion on the combined non-financial statement based on our work performed within a limited assurance engagement.

We conducted our work in the form of a limited assurance engagement in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised): “Assurance Engagements other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information”, published by IAASB. Accordingly, we have to plan and perform the assurance engagement in such a way that we obtain limited assurance as to whether any matters have come to our attention that cause us to believe that the combined non-financial statement of the Company for the period from January 1 to December 31, 2021, has not been prepared, in all material respects in accordance with

§§ 315b and 315c in conjunction with 289b to 289e HGB and with the EU Taxonomy Regulation and the supplementing Delegated Acts as well as the interpretation of the wordings and terms contained in the EU Taxonomy Regulation and in the supplementing Delegated Acts by the legal representatives as disclosed in Section “Reporting in accordance with the EU Taxonomy Regulation” of the combined non-financial statement. We do not, however, issue a separate conclusion for each disclosure. As the assurance procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement are less comprehensive than in a reasonable assurance engagement, the level of assurance obtained is substantially lower. The choice of assurance procedures is subject to the auditor’s own judgement.

Within the scope of our engagement, we performed, amongst others, the following procedures:

• Inquiries of group-level personnel who are responsible for the materiality analysis in order to understand of the processes for determining material topics and respective reporting boundaries for the Group
• A risk analysis, including media research, to identify relevant information on the Group’s sustainability performance in the reporting period
• Evaluation of the design and the implementation of systems and processes for the collection, processing and monitoring of disclosures, including data consolidation, on environmental, employee and social matters, respect for human rights, and combating corruption and bribery matters
• Inquiries of group-level personnel who are responsible for determining disclosures on concepts, due diligence processes, results and risks, performing internal control functions and consolidating disclosures
• Inspection of selected internal and external documents
• Analytical evaluation of data and of the trends of quantitative disclosures as reported at group level by all sites
• Evaluation of local data collection, validation and reporting processes as well as of the reliability of reported data based on a sample of the sites in Ulsan in South Korea, in Meyzieu in France and in Darmstadt in Germany in the form of virtual meetings
• Assessment of the overall presentation of the disclosures
• Evaluation of the process for the identification of taxonomy-eligible economic activities and the corresponding disclosures in the combined non-financial statement

The legal representatives have to interpret vague legal concepts in order to be able to compile the relevant disclosures according to Article 8 of the EU Taxonomy Regulation. Due to the innate risk of diverging interpretations of vague legal concepts, the legal conformity of these interpretations and, correspondingly, our assurance thereof are subject to uncertainty.

In our opinion, we obtained sufficient and appropriate evidence for reaching a conclusion for the assurance engagement.

Independence and Quality Assurance on the Part of the Auditing Firm

In performing this engagement, we applied the legal provisions and professional pronouncements regarding independence and quality assurance, in particular the Professional Code for German Public Auditors and Chartered Accountants (in Germany) and the quality assurance standard of the German Institute of Public Auditors (Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer, IDW) regarding quality assurance requirements in audit practice (IDW QS 1).

Conclusion

Based on the procedures performed and the evidence obtained, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the combined non-financial statement of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, for the period from January 1 to December 31, 2021 has not been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with §§ 315b and 315c in conjunction with 289b to 289e HGB and with the EU Taxonomy Regulation and the supplementing Delegated Acts as well as the interpretation disclosed in Section “Reporting in accordance with the EU Taxonomy Regulation” of the combined non-financial statement.

Restriction of Use/General Engagement Terms

This assurance report is issued for purposes of the Supervisory Board of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, only. We assume no responsibility with regard to any third parties.

Our assignment for the Supervisory Board of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and professional liability as described above was governed by the General Engagement Terms for Wirtschaftsprüfer and Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaften (Allgemeine Auftragsbedingungen für Wirtschaftsprüfer und Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaften) in the version dated January 1, 2017 (https://www.kpmg.de/bescheinigungen/lib/aab_english.pdf). By reading and using the information contained in this assurance report, each recipient confirms notice of the provisions contained therein including the limitation of our liability as stipulated in No. 9 and accepts the validity of the General Engagement Terms with respect to us.

Frankfurt am Main, February 17, 2022

KPMG AG

Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

[Original German version signed by:]

gez. Glöckner
Wirtschaftsprüfer
[German Public Auditor]

ppa. Meldau

¹ Our engagement applied to the German version of the combined non-financial statement 2021. This text is a translation of the Independent Assurance Report issued in German, whereas the German text is authoritative.